
82 Minutes, Black & White, USA, 1958 (held
from general release for censorship reasons until 1962)
Written By: Rex Carlton & Joseph Green
Directed By: Joseph Green
Dramatis Personae:
Jason
Evers is Doctor Bill Cortner, brilliant surgeon, visionary,
and Mad Scientist in training.
Virginia
Leith is Jan Compton, BillÕs fiancˇ and unwitting subject of his
experiments.
Leslie
Daniels is Kurt, BillÕs one-armed lab
assistant, Igor to his Frankenstein.
Adele Lamont is Doris Powell, disfigured and
embittered model.
Bruce Brighton is Doctor
Cortner, BillÕs father and chief of surgery.
Eddie Carmel is The Closet
Monster, one of BillÕs failed experiments, which remains hidden for most of the
movie until its triumphant reveal in the movieÕs fiery climax.
Commentary:
Ah, the Mad Scientist movie. Perhaps no theme
is more enduring in science fiction than Science Gone Horribly Wrong Ŗ. Nothing
captures the viewerÕs imagination more readily than the notion of Science, a discipline
devoted to understanding and improving our world, twisted to serve the whims of
a madman. What is it about this trope that so fascinates us? Why do we as an
audience so easily accept the notion of the Mad Scientist? Perhaps we are
simply intimidated by intellect. Perhaps we see that knowledge is power, and
power can corrupt. Perhaps, as a species, humans prefer to leave well enough
alone, and any great change in how things are done fills us with distrust. ItÕs
easy to suspect the motives of a strange man in a white coat who says he has a
better way. As a consequence, the best Mad Scientists are sympathetic
creatures, driven to Mad Science by forces beyond their control. Engineers
frustrated with bureaucracy. Doctors hell-bent for leather to save human life.
Intellectuals disgusted with the stupidity of the human race in general. How
many times has a Mad Scientist uttered something to the effect of, ŅThey
laughed at me? The fools! IÕll show them!Ó We both love and loathe the Mad
Scientist, because he is, in a sense, our own creation. If only we were a
little more patient, a little more sympathetic, a little less STUPID, maybe he
wouldnÕt be trying to take over the world.
Then you have someone like Bill Cortner from The
Brain That WouldnÕt Die, who is a different animal altogether. A brilliant surgeon,
known for unorthodox techniques and outlandish theories, he certainly has the
makings of a Mad Scientist. But thereÕs something altogether unsympathetic
about this manÉas we shall see.
We meet Bill Cortner in surgery, part of a team
headed by his father working on an accident victim. The elder Doctor Cortner is
unable to save the man, so Bill steps in to try one of his new techniques.
Using some shaky medical science involving direct stimulation of heart and
brain, Bill manages to bring the clinically-dead patient back from the grave.
BillÕs father applauds his success, but makes it clear he doesnÕt approve of
his sonÕs disregard for proper procedure. Bill rather smugly points out that,
even though what he did wasnÕt exactly by the book, it worked, and he just
saved a life his father couldnÕt. The elder Cortner admonishes his son,
pointing out that body parts have gone missing from the amputation ward, and
telling Bill that he knows about his secret lab at their family country house.
His father doesnÕt know what BillÕs doing up there – and he doesnÕt
really WANT to know – but he warns him against too much ambition and
disregard for medical ethics.
But Bill has no time for serious argument, as
he and his perky fiancˇ Jan are getting out of town for the weekend. They are
about to disembark, when Bill gets a message. A man named Kurt called for him,
telling him that there is an emergency at the lab. Bill drags Jan along on a
brief detour up to the Cortner family country house. Unfortunately, BillÕs
impatience and concern cause him to drive recklessly, and he wrecks the car on
a sharp turn (good one, Bill). Bill is thrown clear with only some minor
injuryÉbut Jan is not so lucky. As he staggers back to the wreck, Bill is
horrified by what he sees (all we see is JanÕs spasming hand), bundles
SOMETHING up in his jacket, and hoofs it to his secret lab.
Once there, Bill meets with Kurt, a former
surgeon with a withered and useless left arm, and immediately preps the lab.
Once the procedure is complete, the reveal is made: Jan was decapitated in the
car crash, and Bill will now use his experimental serum to keep her severed
head alive. Of course, this is only a temporary measure; her head cannot be
kept alive indefinitely in the fluid-filled pan he improvised for herÉwhich
means Bill has to somehow get her a new body. Before Bill has a chance to
contemplate the implication of this, Kurt shows him the reason he called: one
of their early experiments has turned violent, and Kurt has locked it in a
closet on the other side of the lab. Bill takes one look inside the room, and
disgustedly orders Kurt to keep it locked up. Then he heads out into the night.
While Bill is out doing distasteful things, Jan
regains consciousness in the lab. Understandably traumatized by the experience,
she grows to hate Bill for what heÕs done to her. She and Kurt chat on and off
while Bill is gone, with Kurt explaining how heÕs been helping Bill with his
experiments in the hopes of regaining use of his left arm and becoming a
surgeon again. Jan also realizes something: somehow the supercharged serum
mixture Bill used to preserve her head has given her extrasensory perception.
She seems to be able to sense what Bill is doingÉand she is able to communicate
with the thing in the closet. Filled with hatred for Bill and self-loathing for
what she has become, Jan conspires with the Closet Monster to take her revenge.
ThereÕs almost always an undercurrent of
anti-intellectualism found in the typical Mad Scientist movie. ThereÕs this
unspoken notion that the very IDEA of doing something different or
revolutionary is evil, and therefore the person doing it is evil, and therefore
deserves to die at the hands of the monster he creates. And while thatÕs certainly
present here, The Brain That WouldnÕt Die takes it to a darker
extreme. Bill Cortner is something worse than your typical Mad Scientist, and
nowhere is this more evident than his solution to the problem of getting Jan a
new body. He immediately starts cruising the seedy parts of town, heading to a
strip club looking for a performer that wonÕt be missed. Now, IÕm willing to
accept the possibility that this is as much a case of sub-par writing as
anything else (boobies are, after all, one of the primary ingredients of a
horror movie, along with blood and gore), but whatÕs disturbing is the
SUDDENNESS of it. Bill doesnÕt agonize over it. DoesnÕt equivocate. DoesnÕt
feel remorse. He goes from Victor Frankenstein to Jack the Ripper in maybe
twenty seconds of screen time. ItÕs already been established that Bill is
arrogant, smug, and disrespectful of the medical establishment, but itÕs quite
a leap from that to potential serial killer. This is not a Mad Scientist in the
traditional sense. This is not a good-intentioned person whoÕs lost his moral
compass; this man has no morals whatsoever.
The scenes of Bill cruising the neighborhood
looking for a victim are quite icky to watch, as are his flirtations with a
stripper wherein he subtly checks the circumference of her throat for
compatibility with JanÕs head. But no scene is more distasteful as the one
where he finally chooses his victim. An artistÕs model named Doris Powell, her
body flawless except for a disfiguring scar an ex-boyfriend left on her cheek
(how convenient for a guy who just happens to have a spare face lying around).
DorisÕs experience with men has made her bitter and reclusive, but Bill manages
to convince her to trust him. After all, heÕs a handsome, respectable doctor,
who just happens to specialize in reconstructive surgery. If you didnÕt hate
this man before, watching him prey on the trust of a damaged young woman will
definitely have you rooting for the Closet Monster.
Jan doesnÕt fare much better in the morality
department. Her transition from devoted fiancˇ to vengeful demon happens very
quickly. Granted, sheÕs had a very traumatic experience (which is to say, sheÕs
a FRIGGING HEAD IN A PAN!), but her desire for revenge comes on just as fast as
BillÕs capacity to murder. Kurt, of course, has something to say about that
(Kurt just canÕt keep his mouth shut, you see, which costs him big time before
the movie is over). In one of his overblown monologues, he speculates that
perhaps the mind and the body were never meant to be separated; when the brain
and the flesh are severed, whither the soul? Possibly JanÕs quick transition
from victim to avenger is a result of her soul being ripped from her body;
perhaps she, like Bill, has had her moral compass removed. Honestly, that would
have been a fascinating idea to explore, but the movie didnÕt go there. The
idea was introduced, then never addressed again.
In fact, a lot is left unexplained and
unexplored. WeÕre told that Bill used a supercharged version of his super-duper
organ preservation fluid to keep JanÕs head alive, and that her limited
telepathic powers are a side-effect. But her powers are never clearly defined.
She seems to be able to sense what Bill is doing, but itÕs never shown with
enough consistency to really pin it down as telepathy or something else. SheÕs
also able to communicate with the Closet Monster, but we never know if thatÕs a
power or not. ItÕs never clear what exactly the Closet Monster IS. Kurt says
that it started out as just a bunch of spare parts that was given a life of its
own, and has ŅmutatedÓ somehow since then. It seems to communicate with Jan,
which implies it has some kind of intelligence. Can it understand her? Is she
actually talking to it? Or is she merely controlling it with her will? We never
know. And IÕm not even going to speculate on how Jan is able to talk without
the benefit of lungs. Makes my head hurt just to think about.
The Brain That WouldnÕt Die goes to darker places
than its contemporary Mad Scientist movies go, and itÕs hard to know what to
make of it. The air of discomfort it gives a modern viewer might well have been
unintentional. The fact that thereÕs a whole mess of gratuitous cheesecake
(even a catfight between two buxom strippers for no dramatically evident
reason!) lead me to believe that Joseph Green might just have been making a
piece of exploitation filmmaking, with plenty of gore and boobies to appeal to
the teenage crowd, and not giving much thought to the undertones of it.
Stranger things have happened; anti-intellectualism by its very nature does not
contemplate itself. The fact that these things are there may just be a
reflection of the culture from which the movie sprang, and not necessarily a
conscious statement by the filmmaker.
And of course, being an intellectual, I have a
tendency to overthink things and see undertones that may not exist. But
whatever this movie may or may not be, what it undeniably IS is an entertaining
little piece of 1950Õs Mad Science, surprisingly strong and dark for its time,
and therefore unique. And so it is worth experiencing.
Things To Look For:
- As I said, thereÕs a
great deal of cheesecake to be found here. Not blatant nudity, of course, but
plenty of scantily clad female forms. We have strippers, models, and even a beauty
contest in the middle of the movie, for no apparent reason except to give Bill
more women to ogle (and lest we forget the aforementioned catfight). I have to
say, seeing this movie nearly half a century removed, itÕs obvious how
standards of attractiveness have changed.
These ladies are women of substance. Not fat, but fleshy. Hips and
breasts and thighs, man. Stuff to hold on to. Nothing like these toothpick
girls wandering around these days. They simply donÕt build women like this
anymore. Kind of sad, reallyÉ
- ThereÕs a shocking
amount of gore in this film, for a 1950Õs movie. Which is probably why it was
censored and held from general release for four years. KurtÕs demise at the
hands of the Closet Monster is perhaps the best example. It somehow manages to
be horrifying and hilarious at the same time, as the Closet Monster rips his
arm out of its socket (his good arm, too! The irony!), and Kurt staggers around
the cottage for a good three minutes, bleeding all over everything before
finally falling down the stairs to his death. ItÕs perhaps one of the great
death scenes in movie historyÉand the fact that when Bill and Doris show up
later and donÕt see ANYTHING to arouse suspicion just makes it all the greater.
Ah, continuityÉ
- I love how neat and tidy
Bill keeps his secret lab. Not a drop of blood anywhere, not a single one of
those missing body parts to be seen, and of course plenty of beakers of
multicolored liquids (well, itÕs a black and white film, so we must ASSUME they
are multicolored liquids). Once again, I may be overthinking things, but it
strikes me as perfect for his character. This is a pleasant, tidy little
country cottage where Tampering In GodÕs Domain just happens to go on, and
thereÕs not a single external indication of the horrors to be found. Just like
Bill Cortner himself, handsome, brilliant surgeon with his charming confidence
and that perfect 1950Õs hair. Externally, a quite nice and respectable
manÉwhoÕs stealing body parts and creating abominations in his basement.
- The Closet Monster was
played by former circus freak Eddie Carmel, in his first film role. Much like
earlier movie heavy Rondo Hatton, he suffered from acromegaly, a disorder of
the pituitary gland which caused him to grow to the height of 7Õ6Ó, and also
contributed to recurring health problems that led to his untimely death at the
age of 36. ThereÕs something poignant about performers like Carmel and Hatton,
who chose to make the most of their conditions and parley them into careers in
entertainment. It smacks a little of exploitation, but at least these men chose
to take control of their own exploitation. I hope wherever they are now, they
can rest easy knowing that they scared the crap out of a few little kids.
Written words (c) 2007-2010 Tim o'Brien. Not to be used without
permission. Other content, including images, is intended as a Fair Use pursuant to 17 U.S.C. sec.
107.
Date Posted: August 20th, 2007
Complaints? Comments? Drop
Me A Line!