CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

 

77 Minutes, Color, USA, 2004

 

Written By: Shane Carruth

 

Directed By: Shane Carruth

 

Dramatis Personae:

 

Shane Carruth is Aaron, engineer and budding garage entrepreneur.

 

David Sullivan is Abe, Aaron's business partner.

 

Carrie Crawford is Kara, Aaron's longsuffering wife.

 

Commentary:

 

Grendel over at Astrocritics sent me this movie as a Christmas present. If you know Grendel at all, the fact that he sends you a movie to watch is enough to make you fear for your sanity, if not your immortal soul. Fortunately, however, I've already gone mad and my soul gave up and left a few years ago, so I think I'm okay. Besides which, Primer is a pretty good movie, and just the sort of thing I love watching: a deep, intelligent movie that messes with your head, and when it's over it just makes you sit down and ponder what the hell you just saw.

 

Our story begins in a garage, somewhere in suburban Texas. Aaron, Abe, and two other partners run a side business, producing electronic components for small companies and private users. Judging from their conversation, they've been at this for a while and haven't had any great success, and there's beginning to be some dissension in the ranks. It's the classic disagreement about a business model: Aaron wants to be innovating, and the others want to actually start turning a profit. The partnership doesn't exactly dissolve, but Aaron and Abe do break away and start on their own project. So they set about building a...thing.

 

What the thing they build actually is isn't fully explained. Apparently they set out to build some kind of capacitor or something, but what they finally created was far from what they intended. Once they cobble the device together and turn it on, they're not sure what it's doing. It makes a whole lot of noise and gives off a lot of heat, but it doesn't seem to do anything else.  They put an object in the box with the device– a Weeble! – and the only side-effect it demonstrates is that it comes out covered in some kind of organic gunk. The gunk, they learn, is a naturally-occurring fungus that's found just about everywhere, but the level of buildup on the Weeble would takes YEARS to accumulate under normal circumstances. Putting a watch in the box confirms it: time flows faster inside. One minute of time outside the box equals about 1300 minutes inside it. They've somehow managed to create and contain a temporal causality loop.

 

Having made this brilliant discovery, Abe and Aaron now have to figure out what to do with it. They're stumped to come up with a practical application of their discovery, until Abe poses a theory: if it were somehow possible to work the machine IN REVERSE, to enter the loop at a specific point, it might be possible to actually GO BACK IN TIME.  So Abe builds a bigger version, one big enough to hold a human being, and he tries it out.  And it works.

 

And that's where things start to go wrong.

 

Anyone who knows me knows that I have a love-hate relationship with Independent Film. I love independent filmmaking as a CONCEPT. The Hollywood system is largely a business, and a business makes products, not works of art.  So a film made outside that system, by an auteur with complete creative control, is a nice idea indeed. But complete creative control does not automatically make a film BETTER. A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter how original it may be. And a bad director is a bad director, regardless of how much or how little control he or she has over the final product. And given the financial constraints inherent in working outside the system, more often than not the budget cannot accommodate the director's full vision, so you tend to get these movies that either feel incomplete or are just too puzzling to fully appreciate. But while Primer certainly is a puzzling little piece of indie filmmaking, at least it's more enjoyable than most.

 

The thing that works so well in this film is the sense of banality that permeates it. The shot-on-video lighting and camerawork, the normalcy of the surroundings, the astounding plainness of our lead actors, all lend a certain credibility to the work. You really get the sense that this is the tale of painfully ordinary people who are striving hopelessly for a moment of brilliance, and stumble into it completely by accident. There is no Jarmusch-ian pretension to the proceedings. This is not a celebration of urban hipster fringe culture; this is firmly rooted in suburban mediocrity and quiet desperation.

 

This is no more evident in the initial reaction Aaron and Abe have to their discovery: they wonder how they can market this device. This is a shining example of everything wrong with their culture. They have stumbled upon time travel, perhaps the single greatest scientific discovery since fire...and all they can think about is how to make a buck off of it. I suppose it says as much about the two men themselves as it does about capitalist society: the sheer thrill of scientific discovery is secondary to whether or not the thing discovered has practical, profitable, applications.  Aaron and Abe have been struggling so long to make a profit that they are no longer capable of thinking in any other terms. No great scientific discovery is worth anything unless it can get them out of their dead-end office day jobs.

 

So naturally, the first thing they do with their time machine is use it to make money: they look at what stocks made the most money that day, then go back to that morning and buy as much stock as they can. Granted, thatÕs probably what IÕd do with it too, but the way Aaron and Abe go about it serves as an illustration of their spiritual desperation. ItÕs only AFTER they start making money that they begin to ponder the ethical ramifications of what theyÕre doing. And the possibility of altering the timeline, possibly for the better. ItÕs worth noting that itÕs Aaron who first comes up with this notion. Abe is the builder, the one concerned with the practical side, and perhaps the one most concerned with the grave consequences of time travel (mainly because he doesnÕt fully understand it, and that scares the crap out of him). Aaron is the one with the ideas and the ambition. Aaron desires to be great, consequences be damned, and when he raises the possibility of traveling back in time, changing a select event in his past or someone elseÕs, things start to get very complicated.

 

Unfortunately, itÕs at this point that movie itself also begins to fall apart. In the last 15 minutes or so, there are at least three copies of both Aaron and Abe running around trying to either alter or restore their original timeline. A subplot with AaronÕs father-in-law apparently discovering the device and using it on the sly is never explained or expanded upon. The movie does not so much END as it simply STOPS; the action quite literally screeches to a halt, Aaron and Abe go their separate ways, nothing is explained, credits roll. ItÕs rather disappointing: there was such a fascinating premise behind Primer that was successfully sustained for three quarters of the film, only to fly completely out of control in the last quarter. Unless thatÕs what Shane Carruth intended all along; after all, when you start messing with the space-time continuum, you start screwing things up on a cosmic level. Trying to work out just what happens at the end, which versions of Aaron and Abe weÕre looking at during the last scene, what exactly theyÕre discussing, is enough to make your brain hurt. And perhaps thatÕs the point.

 

If the point of Independent Film is to present a unique vision that normally would not come to fruition within the mainstream system, then Primer is a resounding success in that regard. ItÕs the rare mainstream film that can make my head hurt the way this one did.

 

Things To Look For:

 

-  Shane Carruth has moments of understated brilliance in his directing, mostly in small touches interspersed throughout the film. One of the best scenes is the introduction of the full-sized time machine: Aaron and Abe are sitting outside of a storage warehouse, pondering how they might build a larger device and where they could put itÉand a few seconds later another Abe walks into the warehouse and opens the storage unit where heÕs built his device. ItÕs done with such subtlety that you donÕt quite realize what you just saw.  Little touches like those abound in the movie, and the low-key low-budget way the movie was shot means your brain has to process it for a second, because youÕre not sure if what you just saw was really what you just saw.

 

-  The design of the time machine itself is delightfully low-tech, as are the mechanics of time travel within the world of the movie. The human-sized device is an airtight box about the size of a coffin. A time traveler has to bring his own oxygen supply, and has to remain in the box for as long as he wishes to travel back in time - which makes a weird kind of sense – and will exit the box at the exact moment his present-day self will activate it. The sheer claustrophobic nature of that arrangement makes my skin crawl to think about. When Abe describes his first trip back in time, the lengths he goes to in order to assure as little disruption of the time stream as possible border on the neurotic – he checks himself into a hotel room, disconnects the phone, unplugs the TV, completely isolates himself from the outside world, THEN goes back in time to re-live the day – yet seem so completely logical. ItÕs not as if Abe is Doctor Who or Captain Kirk; heÕs a complete amateur at time travel, and heÕs trying to do as little damage as possible. As the multiple trips through time take their toll on our protagonists, their symptoms are equal subtle and incomprehensible: Aaron has some of hemorrhage that causes him to bleed from the ear, but has no other ill effects. Abe suffers extreme insomnia and exhaustion. Toward the end both men find they can no longer write properly. None of these symptoms are ever explained, other than simply being side-effects of constant time travel. And perhaps itÕs better that they are never explained. These men are explorers in unknown territory, after all; how can we possibly understand whatÕs happening to them?

 

-  One of the naturalistic touches of the movie is the dialogue. Abe and Aaron, being strong-willed engineers, are constantly talking over each other – the way real people do when theyÕre passionate or excited – and constantly arguing over things that the majority of viewers couldnÕt possibly understand. The movie never explains any of the science involved. We never know what our protagonists are actually building – or trying to build – until itÕs finally created. They rattle off facts and figures about parts and toxicity levels and power output, but nothing is ever explained in laymanÕs terms. All we know is that they built a big box and it doesnÕt do what they thought it would do. And I suppose that works on some level; if we donÕt know what it is, it could very well be ANYTHING, so the fact that it turns out to be a time machine isnÕt all THAT farfetched.

 

-  The one weak plot device, I think, is the narration. Exposition is dealt out in a rather scattershot manner by a narrator, whom we later learn is Aaron, speaking from a point in the future long after these events have taken place. The only purpose for this plot device is apparently to explain parts of the movie that we just wouldnÕt understand unless we had someone to tell us what was going on. And while it certainly does its job, explaining parts of the movie that would make absolutely no sense otherwise, I canÕt help but think this a weakness. I mean, if a filmmaker need to EXPLAIN a part of his film to his audience, then I think that speaks to a flaw in the filmmaker. But this was Shane CarruthÕs first – and to date, only – movie, so I can forgive it. And after all, the presence of the narration also reinforces a basic truth of low-budget filmmaking: effects are expensive, but talk is cheap.

 

Written words (c) 2006-2010 Tim o'Brien. Not to be used without permission. Other content, including images, is intended as  a Fair Use pursuant to 17 U.S.C. sec. 107.

 

Date Posted: December 10, 2006

 

Complaints? Comments? Drop Me A Line!

 

Home Page

 

Archive Page